Usual Suspects
Watching Richard Allen trial I can't help but think of Brittany's case
I’ve been listening to the reports coming out of the Richard Allen trial in Indiana. I’ve heard the evidence so far via news reports and several law tube reporters who’ve been in the courtroom taking notes: relaying and crosschecking evidence, testimony and each other. They are doing the lord’s work out there y’all. The judge has excluded any video or audio of the trial. Her ruling flys in the face of transparency that is supposedly a hallmark of our legal system. I could rant here but you get my drift.
So far, day 12 (including jury selection days) it just hit me - there is more evidence against the original suspect in Brittany's case (DNA match, blood And semen) than Richard Allen in Abby and Libby’s case.
This makes my guts turn.
So what does that mean? That Richard Allen and Tulsa Suspect are both guilty and just one guy is skating at the moment? Or, that both are at this stage factually innocent and rather the Indiana case is more high profile and law enforcement there is even more corrupt?
Because in TULSA? Woo boy- theres corruption in the lab and in the ME's office- And massive CYA in TPD.
Allen puts himself@the crime scene the same day of the murders.
Tulsa Suspect also places himself at the scene with a has reason to be in Brittany's apartment. And because date of death and TL is off - who knows if he was there day of or not?
Both murders were personal in discrete ways. If we look at cause alone: Abby and Libby -stabbed - staged, and Britty- strangled, staged (some officers suggest this is the case based on her appearing “covered up” as if killer making apology).
It’s more likely than not the person in both cases knew or knew of the victims
Both cases sexual in nature, though no SA found via postmortems.
There is nothing presented thus far at Richard Allen’s trial that connects him to the girls at crime scene or outside of the actual event in the community.
Brittany? The suspect is very closely connected.
Allen came forward at his wife's urging when realized he was at the murder scene same day.
Britty's suspect? Said nothing at all - didn’t come forward when he knew his DNA was at that scene- without a doubt. Said nothing even as Maggie drove thousands of miles with a genetic rendering of the suspect plastered on caravan after caravan back and forth across the country.
Who is more of a suspect?
Who is more likely to be involved in the murders?
Which suspect is guilty?
It’s not that easy and it shouldn't be that easy. The burden at this stage falls squarely on the State. The fact is both Richard Allen and the Tulsa Suspect could be guilty or innocent. But so far-from what I’ve seen-the government isn’t meeting its burden in Indiana - and certainly not in Oklahoma.